Pony99CA
06-29-2006, 03:40 AM
WARNING! This is a rant! While this doesn't deal with the Motorola Q directly, it does deal with issues involved with using the Q (or any Windows Mobile 5 device).
When Microsoft introduced ActiveSync 4.0 (http://www.microsoft.com/windowsmobile/downloads/activesync41.mspx), I thought about installing it. After all, the latest ActiveSync should be an improvement right? And it was required to sync any Windows Mobile 5 devices, which was a long-awaited upgrade, and something I wanted to check out. After all, the Dell Axim x51v and the HP iPAQ 2795 looked pretty sweet.
However, I still had an iPAQ 5550 running Windows Mobile 2003, and Microsoft themselves said that people with Windows Mobile 2003 SE or earlier should stick with ActiveSync 3.8. That seemed odd, but I took their advice. I'm glad that I did.
One of the most publicized "improvements" to ActiveSync 4.x was the removal of Remote Syncing (WiFi or LAN) "due to Enterprise customer feedback around security issues." I've done some WiFi syncing, and it's pretty cool, but it's not that big a deal to me. However, as I've written before, I would have thought Microsoft could have created some remote administration tool to allow turning remote sync capability on or off. And I'm still not sure why the ability to sync via USB or Bluetooth is acceptable, but syncing with WiFi isn't. People can steal your data either way; they just have to be a little bit closer now.
However, let's forget about that for now. With the Motorola Q, or any smart phone, you can do wireless sync over a cellular network, which might be good enough for many people. And to use the Q, I had to install ActiveSync 4.1 if I wanted to synchronize my data.
That led me to discover another huge problem with ActiveSync 4.x — Microsoft seems to have removed the Backup/Restore feature! What kind of brain-dead decision was this?
Sure, with non-volatile memory, you don't need to back your device up to avoid data loss in case of a battery failure. However, what if your device spontaneously hard resets (like my iPAQ 5550 did earlier this week)? What if you need to return your device for a warranty repair and they send you a replacement instead of your original device? What if your PDA is lost or stolen and you buy another device? With a backup, you can easily restore your device to the way it used to be.
Yes, you can fairly easily reinstall most of your applications with ActiveSync, and all of your PIM data will be synced, but you'll still have to customize all of your settings again, both for the device itself and every application you have. Of course, you can always buy a backup program (like Sprite Backup (http://pocketnow.com/index.php?a=portal_detail&t=reviews&id=788)), which allows restoring your device anywhere you have a memory card, but why should you have to?
And what about those people who have a Windows Mobile 2003 SE (or earlier) device with a nice large screen that they use as a PDA and a Windows Mobile 5 device to use as a phone? Unless ActiveSync 3.8 and 4.1 can run on the same machine (which is doubtful), they can only sync one device or the other with their PC, but not both. Well, that may not be quite true — if ActiveSync 4.1 works with pre-WM5 devices, they can sync their data, but they can't back it up. One dead battery and you're dead. Thanks a lot, Microsoft.
Microsoft says the advantages of ActiveSync 4.1 include easier partnership setup with a new wizard, faster file transfer (for Windows Mobile 5 devices only) and the ability to synchronize contact photos from Outlook.
Do those advantages outweigh the disadvantages? Should Microsoft give us back remote syncing and backup/restore? Should the ActiveSync product manager be castrated with a rusty butter knife? Share your thoughts in the discussion.
Navigation: Day 1 (http://pocketnow.com/index.php?a=portal_detail&t=news&id=3671), Day 2 (http://pocketnow.com/index.php?a=portal_detail&t=news&id=3676), Day 3 (http://pocketnow.com/index.php?a=portal_detail&t=news&id=3677), Day 5 (http://pocketnow.com/index.php?a=portal_detail&t=news&id=3684)
When Microsoft introduced ActiveSync 4.0 (http://www.microsoft.com/windowsmobile/downloads/activesync41.mspx), I thought about installing it. After all, the latest ActiveSync should be an improvement right? And it was required to sync any Windows Mobile 5 devices, which was a long-awaited upgrade, and something I wanted to check out. After all, the Dell Axim x51v and the HP iPAQ 2795 looked pretty sweet.
However, I still had an iPAQ 5550 running Windows Mobile 2003, and Microsoft themselves said that people with Windows Mobile 2003 SE or earlier should stick with ActiveSync 3.8. That seemed odd, but I took their advice. I'm glad that I did.
One of the most publicized "improvements" to ActiveSync 4.x was the removal of Remote Syncing (WiFi or LAN) "due to Enterprise customer feedback around security issues." I've done some WiFi syncing, and it's pretty cool, but it's not that big a deal to me. However, as I've written before, I would have thought Microsoft could have created some remote administration tool to allow turning remote sync capability on or off. And I'm still not sure why the ability to sync via USB or Bluetooth is acceptable, but syncing with WiFi isn't. People can steal your data either way; they just have to be a little bit closer now.
However, let's forget about that for now. With the Motorola Q, or any smart phone, you can do wireless sync over a cellular network, which might be good enough for many people. And to use the Q, I had to install ActiveSync 4.1 if I wanted to synchronize my data.
That led me to discover another huge problem with ActiveSync 4.x — Microsoft seems to have removed the Backup/Restore feature! What kind of brain-dead decision was this?
Sure, with non-volatile memory, you don't need to back your device up to avoid data loss in case of a battery failure. However, what if your device spontaneously hard resets (like my iPAQ 5550 did earlier this week)? What if you need to return your device for a warranty repair and they send you a replacement instead of your original device? What if your PDA is lost or stolen and you buy another device? With a backup, you can easily restore your device to the way it used to be.
Yes, you can fairly easily reinstall most of your applications with ActiveSync, and all of your PIM data will be synced, but you'll still have to customize all of your settings again, both for the device itself and every application you have. Of course, you can always buy a backup program (like Sprite Backup (http://pocketnow.com/index.php?a=portal_detail&t=reviews&id=788)), which allows restoring your device anywhere you have a memory card, but why should you have to?
And what about those people who have a Windows Mobile 2003 SE (or earlier) device with a nice large screen that they use as a PDA and a Windows Mobile 5 device to use as a phone? Unless ActiveSync 3.8 and 4.1 can run on the same machine (which is doubtful), they can only sync one device or the other with their PC, but not both. Well, that may not be quite true — if ActiveSync 4.1 works with pre-WM5 devices, they can sync their data, but they can't back it up. One dead battery and you're dead. Thanks a lot, Microsoft.
Microsoft says the advantages of ActiveSync 4.1 include easier partnership setup with a new wizard, faster file transfer (for Windows Mobile 5 devices only) and the ability to synchronize contact photos from Outlook.
Do those advantages outweigh the disadvantages? Should Microsoft give us back remote syncing and backup/restore? Should the ActiveSync product manager be castrated with a rusty butter knife? Share your thoughts in the discussion.
Navigation: Day 1 (http://pocketnow.com/index.php?a=portal_detail&t=news&id=3671), Day 2 (http://pocketnow.com/index.php?a=portal_detail&t=news&id=3676), Day 3 (http://pocketnow.com/index.php?a=portal_detail&t=news&id=3677), Day 5 (http://pocketnow.com/index.php?a=portal_detail&t=news&id=3684)